Why It Matters

Converging on a better ontology matters because it changes how we build solutions. If the evidence continues to challenge strict materialism, then many of our approaches in psychology, neuroscience, biology, and physics may be optimized for the wrong underlying model. Right now we often treat the mind like a set of components, a tire problem here, a spark plug problem there. But it is hard to fix a car if you do not realize you are working on a car.

A foundation problem, not a niche debate

An ontology is not a belief. It is an architectural assumption about what is fundamental and what is derivative. It determines what we treat as signal, what we dismiss as noise, and what kinds of explanations we allow.

What changes if we converge

If we can converge on a survivor model that satisfies constraints across physics and experience, we get practical benefits:

• Better hypotheses and cleaner experiments

• Better definitions of signal, noise, and confounds

• Better interventions in mind and behavior that target the true control points

• Better conceptual alignment between observation, measurement, and outcome in physics

Even if the current leaders fail, the audit still matters. A public constraint registry and evidence trail narrows the search space and raises the standard for what counts as an explanation.

How UTE operationalizes the search

We publish a constraint registry, grade evidence, score candidates with an explicit rubric, and red-team survivors with traceable revision control. If you want the workflow and scoring standard, start with the Method page and the methodology PDF.

How you can help

If you have strong criticism, primary sources, replication attempts, or counterexamples, send them. The fastest way to improve the map is to attack it with better evidence and clearer constraints.

Read the Audit Methodology (PDF, v4.0)
View the latest Results
Explore the leading Model
Contact us