The Unified Theory of Experience Project

Explore the Architecture of Experience

An audit-grade investigation into the nature of reality, the mechanics of experience, and the anomalies standard science cannot explain.

An Engineering Audit of Reality

THE APPROACH

The UTE Project is an independent, forensic audit of ontology. Rather than arguing worldviews in the abstract, we treat competing theories of reality—Materialism, Idealism, Dualism—as rival software architectures. The project evaluates them against a shared "Constraint Registry" of hard data, ranging from quantum mechanics to clinical neuroscience.

View the Methodology

THE PROBLEM

The Structural Mismatch

It is very difficult to fix a car if you don’t realize you are working on a car. We have spent centuries mastering the individual components, but the data now suggests our blueprint and schematics are incorrect.

By shifting from a component view to a system view of our universe, we can see where the real connections are. This allows us to move beyond treating symptoms and design interventions that target the true control points of the vehicle.

  • An ontology is not just a belief; it is an architectural assumption. It determines what we treat as signal and what we dismiss as noise. If our foundational model is wrong, every experiment built on top of it is optimized for the wrong variables.

  • Finding a model that satisfies both the laws of physics and the facts of experience is not just a philosophical win; it is a clinical necessity.

    When we bridge the gap between "Mind" and "Matter" through the bioelectric interface, we move from treating the mind as a black box to understanding its specific mechanics. This convergence allows for:

    • Better Interventions: Moving beyond "chemical imbalance" models in psychology to precise, information-based therapies.

    • Clinical Precision: Using bioelectric re-programming to address anatomical scaling and repair.

    • A Measured Reality: Providing the first formal, mechanistic definition of the observer in quantum mechanics.

  • We do not rely on philosophy alone. We grade evidence, score candidates with an explicit rubric, and red-team 'survivor models' against a public constraint registry. This is an engineering workflow applied to a metaphysical problem.

THE STRATEGY

Putting Outliers at the Center

In standard research, anomalies are often dismissed as statistical noise. In engineering, they are treated as failure modes—the critical clues that reveal where the system architecture is incomplete.

The UTE Project inverts the standard approach. Instead of discarding data that challenges the dominant model, it treats those edge cases as high-value constraints. In this view, “Black Swan” events—such as the Ryan Hammons “trap door” case or the Roehrs terminal-lucidity reports—are not errors to be ignored, but boundary conditions that any serious model of reality must account for.

THE OUTPUT

Access the Research

Open-source engineering protocols for the study of experience

The Audit Protocols

The complete "Constraint Registry" and grading rubric we use to evaluate ontological models against hard data.

Survivor Models

The current leaderboard. See which models of reality satisfy the constraints of both physics and experience.

Field Notes

Real-time forensics, "Black Swan" deep dives, and community debate on the latest anomalies.